Ron Paul Supported By Nazis and other ass gaskets

I had left a few negative comments about Ron Paul, on another blog that was just beaming with support for the weirdo loon. They were making false, undocumented statements that the Military supports Ron Paul and has made huge donations to the crackpot, more so than to any other republican. I assumed that they meant the US Military, so I disagreed and asked for proof to back up what was being said there and immediately was told to please die, among a few other comments toward me, and was asked by one person, why I thought Ron Paul was leaning toward being a libertarian bordering on socialist views.I gave a brief explanation, stating that I might have misstated my opinion and suggested maybe more of a Marxist, and cited a few groups that also supported Ron Paul, such as the Christian Socialist party in the Netherlands, and the American Nazi Part, and the KKK.I thought that I should post a bit more here, for when the drones come from the site where my comments are posted, they can read more about why their loony candidate, Ron Paul, sucks and is bad for America.Also I still stand by my comment that most of the people from the Incontiguous Brick Blog sound like MoveOn.whore commenters and supporters. Yes that is B-r-i-c-k with a B not a P.

FITSNews - September 23, 2007 - A presidential long-shot is scoring big with white supremacist voters, although oddly enough it’s not their “official candidate.”

Texas Congressman Ron Paul is receiving “all the pro-white support,” the American Nazi Party’s nominee for president said in an exclusive interview with FITSNews.

From inside his campaign headquarters in Laurens, S.C. - an old movie theater converted into a Ku Klux Klan museum and National Socialist Movement meeting hall – John Taylor Bowles said he doesn’t understand why so many members of a white nationalist Web forum, Stormfront.org, are supporting Paul for president and not him.

Ok, even though some of the same Nut Jobs (Truthers) that support the wacked out theory that 9-11 was a government coverup, and an inside job, support the loon Ron Paul. Paul also has the support of the Ku Klux Klan.

This Dick Head named Ron Paul, Not only believes that the US government is involved with a 9-11 coverup but is for legalizing drugs, is anti war and anti current US policy. He calls the USA occupiers who are causing terrorism. He states that suicide bombers are not religious radicals but they do so because we (the USA) are occupiers, and that our policies contribute to terrorism. That we are intimidating Iran and should back off and bring our troops home immediately and states “Look how much peace there was in Viet Nam since we left there” WTF??? This one comment alone should make people say…What is this asshole saying? Is he living in an alternate universe? How bad do the Liberals want to take potential votes away from the republicans? Paul’s supporters are not Conservatives or Republicans, but mindless robotic drones that can not think for themselves and they like what Paul is spewing, which is “Bring The Troops Home Now” and “The USA Basically is evil” for that moronic platform, and anti American propaganda, paul appears to have convinced an army of mindless liberals in libertarians clothing to support him and take away votes for real politicians.

Watch this video of Paul speaking and see for yourself what an ass gasket this joker really is

11 Responses to “Ron Paul Supported By Nazis and other ass gaskets”

  1. Well I hate to admit it but I have been reading more and more about Ron Paul. I have to take back some of the negative comments that I have made about him…..EXCEPT for the fact that Ron Paul is anti war, and that he can sound a bit….well…..Crazy, he does seem to be one of the most conservative candidates running for President of the United States.

    I have to say that if I had to make a choice between Ron Paul and Rudy Giuliani, well I’ll just say that Rudy would not be my choice. Hey Rudy, maybe you can go into your sanctuary cities and talk your Illegal Mexican invader friends into having abortions?

    My candidate is Fred Thompson, since Newt did not run, but like the once popular game of “Where’s Waldo” I am afraid I might continue to be saying….”Where’s Fred?”

    I am now considering Sam Brownback. I think he seems to be the most in line with conservatives today. I respect a man who states his beliefs and stands by them.

    Like Ronald Reagan, Senator Sam Brownback believes that America must be that ‘Shining City on a Hill’ where faith, moral values, respect for life, and the sanctity of marriage are celebrated.

    I thought a bit about Mitt Romney, but he made the statement “If we catch Osama I don’t want anything to do with his execution” That statement, along with other reasons I don’t care for him, was a big decision maker for me.

    Tom Tancredo, Sam Brownback, Duncan Hunter and, I guess Mike Huckabee are really the only “conservatives” left that might have a chance. Since it seems that all Republican candidates are trying to play the “Conservative” role now.

  2. Readers please note that I am making a notation on this comment and have, in NO WAY changed anything within it. That said……
    I will let this one comment from Brian through to my blog with this Warning…………
    The following comment is a rehearsed and contains common talking points which you will find on Moveon. org, Ron Paul supporters sites, and general Anti America/Anti War sites everywhere. The following comment really makes no sense and is filled with false figures and non truths. It is a statement by supporters of a fringe lunatic and self loathing Liberitarians everywhere. Here is the comment………..

    on foreign policy which you call blame america first like many moronic flag waving americans would.

    War and Foreign Policy

    The war in Iraq was sold to us with false information. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies, the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. This war has cost more than 3,000 American lives, thousands of seriously wounded, and hundreds of billions of dollars. We must have new leadership in the White House to ensure this never happens again.

    Both Jefferson and Washington warned us about entangling ourselves in the affairs of other nations. Today, we have troops in 130 countries. We are spread so thin that we have too few troops defending America. And now, there are new calls for a draft of our young men and women.

    We can continue to fund and fight no-win police actions around the globe, or we can refocus on securing America and bring the troops home. No war should ever be fought without a declaration of war voted upon by the Congress, as required by the Constitution.

    Under no circumstances should the U.S. again go to war as the result of a resolution that comes from an unelected, foreign body, such as the United Nations.

    Too often we give foreign aid and intervene on behalf of governments that are despised. Then, we become despised. Too often we have supported those who turn on us, like the Kosovars who aid Islamic terrorists, or the Afghan jihadists themselves, and their friend Osama bin Laden. We armed and trained them, and now we’re paying the price.

    At the same time, we must not isolate ourselves. The generosity of the American people has been felt around the globe. Many have thanked God for it, in many languages. Let us have a strong America, conducting open trade, travel, communication, and diplomacy with other nations.

  3. Ron Paul’s the man. If it’s nutty to oppose bombing people who aren’t our enemies, count me in. If it’s nutty to want to protect our borders and preserve our society, count me in. If it’s nutty to want to stop spending money we don’t have, then count me in.

    Ron Paul for President!

  4. Kenny, you almost made sense with your comment…..If you did not include the anti war spew that is just a big pile of B.S. Pushed down the throats of Americans by the “Truthers” and other anti U.S. government, aluminum hat wearing wacko groups, and Hollyweird Scientologists.. We are not bombing innocent people, why are you falling prey to that propaganda, and then repeating it??

    The only reason that there is the support for Ron Paul, which there is, is that truthers and anti war groups are spreading the Ron Paul word like it is good for this country. Most of these same people will not even vote for Ron Paul, they just see a way to further their agenda and are using the words “Conservative” and “Constitution” like they really believe in, or support either one!

    If you took the time to read anything that I have posted on my blog, besides some of the crazy comments where people are twisting the meanings of my words, and agreeing with Wacko Ron Paul, that the USA was attacked because of our foreign policy, (It’s our fault) I think they might not like that we are allies with Israel, (typical), you would see that I too have the same “Protect our borders” attitude and as a conservative, I also agree that we need to cut spending, just not on what jeopardizes our troops overseas, or our safety here in America, but wasteful social programs, foreign aid and invader amnesty, which the Democrats are going to force down the working class throats, if they, or a non conservative President is elected in 2008. After all liberals want to tax excessively to pay for their socialist programs.

    Where Ron Paul and most people, including myself, differ widely is some of the crazy things that he says like blaming the USA for 9-11, criticizing our foreign policy, and I don’t mean the foreign policy the way President Bush interprets it. (after all President Bush is not a conservative,) and being anti war stating that if you believe in fighting for your country you are not following the constitution….How stupid is that???

    What you and other Paul supporters define as being a conservative, is not all there is to it! Being a conservative is much more than saying that you do not support this or any other war and that we must stick to the constitution verbatim.
    This is one definition of Conservatism:

    “The inclination, especially in politics, to maintain the existing or traditional order”.

    How you maintain traditional order is open to interpretation.

    It’s too bad that you refuse to support a real conservative like Fred Thompson or Tom Tancredo.

    Thanks for your comment.

  5. Ok all of you people that like to spew the new word that they learned from some Truther site (Neo-Con) or are confused about what a true Conservative is……
    Presidency of Ronald Reagan
    President Reagan, with his Cabinet and staff, in the Oval Office (February 4, 1981)
    Enlarge
    President Reagan, with his Cabinet and staff, in the Oval Office (February 4, 1981)

    Headed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1989, the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, also known as the Reagan Administration, was conservative, steadfastly anti-Communist, employed a foreign policy of “peace through strength,” and favored tax cuts and smaller government.

    Reagan was an advocate of free markets and, upon taking office, believed that the American economy was hampered by excessive economic controls and misguided welfare programs enacted during the 1960s and 1970s. Taking office during a period of stagflation, Reagan said in his first inauguration speech, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” His first act as president was to issue an executive order ending certain price controls. His supply-side economics policies, or “Reaganomics”, achieved a 25% cut in the federal personal income tax, moderate deregulation and tax reform, which he believed would remove barriers to efficient economic activity. After a sharp recession, a long period of high economic growth without significant inflation ensued.

    Despite Reagan’s stated desire to cut spending, federal spending grew during his administration.

    One of Reagan’s most controversial early moves was to fire most of the nation’s air traffic controllers who took part in an illegal strike. Reagan strengthened Social Security to make it solvent longer by cutting disability benefits, and survivor benefits, and by increasing the FICA payroll witholding tax. He also took tough positions against crime, declared a renewed war on drugs, but was criticized for being slow to respond to the AIDS epidemic.

    In foreign affairs, Reagan initially rejected détente and confronted the Soviet Union through a policy of “peace through strength,” including increased military spending, firm foreign policies against the USSR and support for anti-communist groups around the world. Reagan later embraced the reformer Mikhail Gorbachev after he rose to power and together they peacefully ended the Cold War.

    Some foreign interventions, such as the one in Lebanon, ended in failure, while others, such as the invasion of Grenada, were successful. Involvement in the Iran-Iraq War at times favored Iraq, believing Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was less dangerous. The Administration also engaged in covert arms sales to Iran in order to fund anti-communist Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The resulting Iran-Contra Affair became a scandal to which Reagan professed ignorance. A significant number of officials in the Reagan Administration were either convicted or forced to resign as a result of the scandal.

    However, by the end of the Reagan presidency, a high level of public approval (64% of the nation) indicated that the administration had recovered its image among the American public due to the perceived restoration of America’s power, prosperity and national pride.

  6. Ronald Reagan also said this about Ron Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yuzMYIXhTE&feature=related

  7. Hey Mr.Mark, just keep in mind that there were other people besides Ron Paul who once might have supported the USA then turned and went insane and became a threat to this country like…..Saddam Hussein??? Just to mention one of many.

  8. The following comment has been edited because of profanity too extreme to post on my blog:

    WHY YOU ATTACKING Ron Paul XXXXXXX ?? What YOU A Sean Hannity FAN XXXX YOU DUDE….

  9. First of all Ted, you need to calm down and quit trying to post profanity on my blog, I will not allow it. (Except, of course, when I do it)
    Now to the meat of this response…….You and people like you (8 8) are the reason I am stating facts about Ron Paul. If you think that just because I do not support Heir Paul, That automatically makes me a “Sean Hannity Fan” Then you are wrong, as I always liked Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, long before Ron Paul decided to lose the run for President.

    People call Rush and Hannity the “Far Right” but they do not really know just what the far, right-wing really is, now do they?

    Maybe you can have a boot party when Paul loses and if we, true Americans, are lucky enough you and others like you will totally fade away this time.

    God Bless and have a nice day.

  10. do you have a medical degree for you to label or diagnose people’s mental health ?

    your labeling comments are distracting people away from issues representing the candidates….

    George Bush’s grandfather Prescott Bush supported the financing of the Third Reich where they used capital to make jeeps for the blitzkrieg…

    are you going to say that bush’s grandfather was insane and the current president is normal for your
    name labels to cofirm your viewpoints….

  11. First of all let me say that you might be right, it might not be Ron Paul who is the crazy person, but people like you who support him.

    A person does not need a medical degree to be able to tell when someone has mental problems….well let me restate that because, obviously you have them and don’t see Ron Paul’s either.

    Are you trying to say that because a relative of someone was sympathetic to the Nazis that makes the relation guilty by association, or in this case, relationship? Or are you just another George Bush Hater like so many other Anti American leftists that are not proud of the greatest country in the world, America, and what it stands for?

    George Bush was not supported by the Nazis or the Arian Nation like your hero, Ron Paul was……Notice I said “Was” because it’s all over for Heir Paul.

    I am not distracting anyone and if you believe that I could then you have little faith in the group of weirdos who support Ron Paul.

    With all of that said………Let me say that some of what Paul said was not all crazy I just can not support someone who has Anti American, conspiracy theories, and does not believe that we are hated by some because of our greatness and freedoms and who also believes that our foreign policy and arrogance is what perpetuated an attack on this country.

    If Paul did not say some of those stupid things , I too might have gotten behind some of his more conservative ideologies.

    Now, thanks to people like you, we have a choice between the three stooges for president, one worse, for this great country, than the next. I said in many of my earlier posts that some Paul supporters were only in it to take votes away from a real conservative candidate, which apparently worked, and now you can vote for Barack Hussein Obama or Billary Clinton on the left and John (RINO) McCain on the….well also on the left, just not quite as far…….Yet.

Leave a Reply