You asshole Anti war and wacko truther groups are still not fooling anyone into believing that you really will vote for Ron Paul…Oh yeah there will be a few of you who will actually vote for that whacked out politician but very few.

Rozenfeld and the rest of you losers who claim to support Ron,its our fault, Paul, can go back to your cesspools that you drained out of. As for the staffer that Paul dismissed, he was said to have had homosexual acts with him. You are the one with the uninformed opinion you keep spewing lies and keep repeating the same B.S over and over. I posted Pauls sorry voting record in an earlier post….What the heck are you looking at? Obviously not the real records. Here is an excerpt….AGAIN….

Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
Voted NO on Constitutionally defining marriage as one-man-one-woman. (Jul 2006)
Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
Voted NO on constitutional amendment prohibiting flag desecration. (Jun 2003)
No legislation to counteract the homosexual agenda. (Sep 2007)
Protect all voluntary associations; don’t define marriage. (Oct 2007)
Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999)
Voted NO on subjecting federal employees to random drug tests. (Sep 1998)
Voted NO on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror. (Nov 2001)
Voted NO on requiring states to test students. (May 2001)
Voted NO on establishing nationwide AMBER alert system for missing kids. (Apr 2003)
Voted YES on reducing Marriage Tax by $399B over 10 years. (Mar 2001)
Voted NO on reforming the UN by restricting US funding. (Jun 2005)
Inappropriate to impose sanctions for persecuting Christians. (Sep 2007)
Voted NO on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade. (Jul 2005)
Voted NO on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement. (Jul 2004)
Voted NO on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement. (Jul 2003)
Voted NO on implementing free trade agreement with Chile. (Jul 2003)

Ron Paul is an Idiot! He would make a great Nazi, after all they are his kind of conservatives…

I prefer a real Conservative that values the freedoms of the USA and is proud to say the USA is number one and will stay that way no matter what!

Now go away and pout……

How would you know whether the majority of Ron Paul supporters are white supremacists or anything else?

As for Ron Paul and Jews being oil and vinegar, this is just your uninformed opinion. Ron Paul has made his position on individual rights clear over and over again and has a voting record to prove it.

As for being dense, it is pretty clear that you are being dense when you ignore everything he has said and done over the last 30 years but instead keep repeating statements made by a staffer that he has clearly repudiated.

You believe what you want to believe.

Headed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1989, the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, also known as the Reagan Administration, was conservative, steadfastly anti-Communist, employed a foreign policy of “peace through strength,” and favored tax cuts and smaller government.

Reagan was an advocate of free markets and, upon taking office, believed that the American economy was hampered by excessive economic controls and misguided welfare programs enacted during the 1960s and 1970s. Taking office during a period of stagflation, Reagan said in his first inauguration speech, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” His first act as president was to issue an executive order ending certain price controls. His supply-side economics policies, or “Reaganomics”, achieved a 25% cut in the federal personal income tax, moderate deregulation and tax reform, which he believed would remove barriers to efficient economic activity. After a sharp recession, a long period of high economic growth without significant inflation ensued.

Despite Reagan’s stated desire to cut spending, federal spending grew during his administration.

One of Reagan’s most controversial early moves was to fire most of the nation’s air traffic controllers who took part in an illegal strike. Reagan strengthened Social Security to make it solvent longer by cutting disability benefits, and survivor benefits, and by increasing the FICA payroll witholding tax. He also took tough positions against crime, declared a renewed war on drugs, but was criticized for being slow to respond to the AIDS epidemic.

In foreign affairs, Reagan initially rejected détente and confronted the Soviet Union through a policy of “peace through strength,” including increased military spending, firm foreign policies against the USSR and support for anti-communist groups around the world. Reagan later embraced the reformer Mikhail Gorbachev after he rose to power and together they peacefully ended the Cold War.

Some foreign interventions, such as the one in Lebanon, ended in failure, while others, such as the invasion of Grenada, were successful. Involvement in the Iran-Iraq War at times favored Iraq, believing Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was less dangerous. The Administration also engaged in covert arms sales to Iran in order to fund anti-communist Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The resulting Iran-Contra Affair became a scandal to which Reagan professed ignorance. A significant number of officials in the Reagan Administration were either convicted or forced to resign as a result of the scandal.

However, by the end of the Reagan presidency, a high level of public approval (64% of the nation) indicated that the administration had recovered its image among the American public due to the perceived restoration of America’s power, prosperity and national pride.

Why are some of his supporters calling me a “Flag Waving American” like that is a bad thing??? If these people truly loved America they might consider “Flag Waving” a patriotic thing. Their enemy is foreign and domestic hate against America, yet they only show support for Ron Paul, they will denounce the other Republican candidates yet never denouncing the liberal left what does that show? Are these people trying to bleed votes away from the true Conservatives? Most of the commenter’s here and at some Ron Paul support sites do have some of the same talking points which can be found at Moveon. whore. and Code Stink. I think these people are trying to build Paul up to lessen votes for a Republican candidate who is a true conservative and will oppose the liberal agenda and then vote for their Democrat candidate, leaving all you true brainwashed Ron Paul supporters to sink on a ship full of holes from fighting a loosing battle.

I already said that if Paul didn’t make so many insane statements he might be a viable candidate, or at least someone who is sane with the same principals might be a great conservative, just not Ron Paul.

Also to invoke the name of the Greatest Conservative this country has ever seen or ever will, Ronald Reagan, to push your support for Paul, is really sinking to a new low for Ron Paul supporters. How dare you even elude to President Reagan when you speak of Ron Paul, let alone try to use President Reagan’s words and try to to compare the Lunatic Fringe Politician, wanna be President, Ron Paul, to Ronald Reagan a true conservative and a real man who was worthy of being the President of the United States Of America.

I don’t agree with President Bush on 100% of what he stands for either, after all he is no conservative and has disappointed many of us conservatives in the past and I am sure until he is out of office, he will continue to do so. However President Bush was the best choice for President, (both terms.)

As for my vote counting?? are you serious? every vote against Ron Paul counts, it’s just too bad that people who would be voting for the best conservative candidates and not a wacko like Paul, are bleeding votes from a true conservative candidate such as Tom Tancredo or Fred Thompson.

Also here are some accurate and unchanged quotes from Ronald Reagan:

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children what it was once like in the United States when men were free.

If it’s to be a bloodbath, let it be now. Appeasement is not the answer.

Dr. Paul never blamed the US for the attackes on 9-11 you didn’t read the transcripts or you didn’t see the debate. Instead he suggested it was our policy’s which resulted and aided 9-11.

As far as the veto stance for the proposed bills if you support the law of the land you would have opposed them as well.

Besides did you read each bill and the admendments attached? Most do not but instead post a number of bills to make is appear paul is anti this or that. Keep in mind when you read the so called patriot act I find nothing patrotic about this bill due to the fact you and I can be deemed actual terrrorist without a fair trail, contacting family, etc.

It isn’t my intention to argure is you or or not a Neo-con but it’s my strong assertion that the best way to support the troops is to end the war as bush promised by Christmas the first year.

By the way Bush did claim victory in Iraq and made a big deal about it by landing for the press stunt.

While my loved ones are in Iraq fighting in an illegal war his daughters are no longer babies and he has lost some of the best years of his daughters life.

No WMD’s, not threat to our nation at all. So supporiting Bush’s lies will not change the facts.

Most all the pro war hawks never fight in battle or serve. Ron Paul has. I have never served in service but I have started a non profit to help the returning vets.

By the way your introduction to neoconservative paints a blue sky view. I would suggest you study the father of the neoconservative movement and find he was in fact a supporter of the Nazi party. In fact many of the issues we face now are very similar to the plans of hitler. You only need to do your own research to discover the facts.

In closing I have been a GOP member for over 20 years and I have supported the limited gov view I never voted for the actions that Bush has pursued if he had been honest with us I would have not voted for Bush at all but rather the Constitution Party.

Never forget a wise statement from Reagan.

“When we began the war on poverty, poverty won. His son has recently agreeded and so have many others now confirm the war on drugs well drugs won. The war on terror was just to set up a police state so terror won. I could go on and on.

In the end I hope you will discover the real facts of Paul and if so perhaps your vote will count if not it will be a vote agaist the constitution becuase we know for a fact in a recent debate that Mitt, Rudy, Duncan and Mike all did not confirm if they would consult congress if war was needed in fact Mitt stated he would consult his lawyer. Ron Paul was the only one who said he would consult congress.

A vote for any other GOP member other then Ron Paul is a vote against the constitution!

Although you just might be one of the majority as you stated, blacks are no less victims of this propaganda for Ron Paul and, just like anyone else, can fall victim to supporting someone or something that is not really in their best interest

Did you totally miss this part of Paul’s speech?
Paul states that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered “as decent people.” Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote:”Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,’ I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.” Paul also wrote that although “we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.”

Oh and BTW, Rozenfeld, Ron Paul and Jews are kind of like oil and vinegar….or did you already know this??

AND No proof of the donations that they supposedly made, either. The majority of his donations are coming from White Supremacists and Nazis….See my post with the references to the proof.

Thanks for the comment and dude, put the pipe down…OK?

If you support the military, vote for Ron Paul because the people actually in the military want him to be president.

What does that leave? I guess that since you don’t like labels then you must be a Nomad who does not have any opinions worth fighting or voting for and will not, or rather Should not, vote for The President of The United States since you would have to pick a “Labeled” Candidate, as there is no one running that will state that they are not a member of any political party. OK enough I know you are either a Socialist or a Liberal (More Labels) come on why do you people always hide behind this spewing of propaganda? why not be like the Homosexuals and come out of the closet?

Liz, You are right about name calling being childish….I can’t argue with that part. It is just that this such a “Hot Topic” and since I am not running for office, lol, I feel that I can get down in the mud and sling it right back into the face of the commenter’s who sling it at me. Though not the most intellectual way to argue, it does have its merits.

As for calling Ron Paul names……If I believe someone who is running for the ofice of President of the United States of America is “Nuts” or “Insane” I have the right to say so, you see that is part of the benefit of free speech in this country. I am not punished or persecuted for stating my opinions, or what I have determined is fact. I believe that calling a politician what he is, even if I use less than “Nice” names for him, is a lot better than some of his supporters calling me a “moronic flag waving American” or worse. With that comment this person just insinuated that all Americans who wave flags are Moronic.

I also feel that since I vote, pay taxes, and am here legally, I have the right to discuss American politics and complain or praise the Americans in or running for office first, before non voters, or foreigners who neither live in this country, nor vote here.

You have a great day Mark.